Impacting Even Affluent Neighborhoods: Where You Live Can Affect Your Ability To Conceive



According to a recent Oregon State University study, women who live in areas with lower socioeconomic mobility have a 20% lower chance of becoming pregnant at any given time than women who live in areas with more resources.

The study evaluated "fecundability," or the chance of getting pregnant on a monthly basis, among couples trying to get pregnant naturally.

Researchers compared neighborhoods using the "area deprivation index" score, which is a gauge of a neighborhood's socioeconomic resources. They found that even within a reasonably well-off, highly educated research population, fecundity rates were lower in less affluent neighborhoods than in more affluent ones.

"Research on fertility is starting to look at elements related to the built environment. The pre-conception period is structurally understudied, according to lead author Mary Willis, a postdoctoral scholar in OSU's College of Public Health and Human Sciences. "There are dozens of studies looking at how your neighborhood environment is associated with poor birth outcomes, but the pre-conception period is heavily under-studied," she said. It turns out that factors could effect your health even before conception.

The idea that the ZIP code is the best predictor of total life expectancy based on factors such as income, education level, access to clean water, employment rates, and health care have both been highlighted by public health studies in the previous 10 years.

But there hasn't been much research done on the idea that your area influences your fertility, according to Willis. Additionally, since most infertility research focuses on specific individual characteristics, when I entered this project as an environmental epidemiologist, I believed that we should consider infertility as a structural issue.

Data from Boston University's continuing pregnancy research, the Pregnancy Study Online, were used in the study (PRESTO). Data collected from 2013 to 2019 were used to evaluate a cohort of 6,356 people, aged 21 to 45, who were attempting to become pregnant without the aid of fertility treatment.

Every eight weeks for up to a year, study participants responded to online surveys asking about the characteristics of their menstrual cycles and whether or not they were pregnant. 3,725 pregnancies in the research period were recorded.

Researchers examined socioeconomic characteristics such as educational attainment, housing, employment, and poverty to compare participants across various area deprivation index rankings on a national and state-by-state basis.         
According to national rankings, they discovered that participants in the poorest neighborhoods had a 19–21% lower rate of fecundity than those in the wealthiest areas. The most impoverished neighborhoods experienced a 23-25% decrease in fecundability in comparison to the least impoverished areas, according to rankings within states.

The same outcomes at the national and state levels clearly demonstrate that neighborhood disadvantage can affect reproductive health, including fertility, according to Willis.

Because fertility treatments are expensive and typically only available to couples with significant wealth, she suggested that looking at fertility studies from a structural perspective could assist reduce or prevent infertility in general.

The study comes to the conclusion that efforts to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in underprivileged areas may have a favorable impact on reproduction.

By OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do You Sleep on Your Back or Side? Here's The Research on 'Optimal' Sleep Positions

Image
William Dement, a renowned sleep researcher at Stanford University, is quoted as saying that after 50 years of study, the only reason he can think of for why we sleep is "because we become sleepy." Sleep certainly matters for our health and wellbeing even though it may be, as one researcher put it, "the sole major habit in quest of a function." Do we, however, have it right? What do studies on sleeping positions say? Is there a proper sleeping position? The majority of people favor sleeping on their side. This is encouraging news because people who sleep on their backs are more likely to have trouble falling asleep or breathing during the night. Most of the time, we have a tendency to shift around quite a bit at night. According to a study involving 664 sleepers, on average, participants slept on their side 54% of the time, their back 37% of the time, and their front 7% of the time. Males are more likely to change positions throughout the night and move their arms, ...
Read more

A Briefcase-Sized Box Is Already Making Oxygen on Mars

Image
Currently, the Martian atmosphere is in no way hospitable to Earthlings. It is formed primarily of carbon dioxide and is over 100 times less dense than Earth's atmosphere. It would soon stop breathing completely for any individuals who tried to breathe in it. A modest device, about the size of a suitcase, has been consistently extracting breathable oxygen from the Martian atmosphere on that sandy, arid, alien world. In order to manufacture breathing air for a human expedition to the red planet, it is the first demonstration of the processing of in situ resources for human use on another world. Its name is MOXIE (Mars Oxygen In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) Experiment), and it is a device that utilizes electrolysis to separate Martian carbon dioxide into carbon monoxide and oxygen. It is mounted inside NASA's Perseverance rover. According to the researchers, MOXIE produced oxygen seven times as much between February 2021, when Perseverance arrived, until the end of 2021. Acco...
Read more

New DNA Research Unlocks Secrets of Native Rodents’ Rat Race to New Lands

Image
More than 150 different native rodent species from Australia, New Guinea, and Melanesian islands have had their DNA sequenced in recent studies. It provides a fuller understanding of their connections and the circumstances surrounding their expansion throughout the Pacific. The Australian National University's (ANU) Dr. Emily Roycroft, the study's lead author, said native rodents are an interesting but frequently underappreciated evolutionary group. Dr. Roycroft noted that over 150 species in Australia and New Guinea are unique to those regions and include the rakali, sometimes known as the "water rat," which is frequently spotted swimming in the lakes near Canberra. We now know relatively little about the history and development of native rodents, particularly those found in New Guinea. In order to obtain DNA from museum specimens up to 180 years old, including several extinct and secretive species, the study team developed a novel technique. "One Guadalcanal ra...
Read more